The Financial Impact of Downtime on the Trading Floor: $9 million/hour

By Israel Hersh, SVP Business Development, tekVizion

Could it be anachronistic that a trade is still done over the phone, while we live in a world of algorithms and billions of dollars being traded each second? Yes indeed.

But for fixed income, commodities, and currency (FICC) trading it is still all about voice trading using either a phone or Unified Communications (UC) platform. These exotic trades need explanation, negotiation, agreement – thanks to the complexity of the financial instruments traded and the risk of speculation, the regulators expect all of this to be recorded across email, text and voice.

This means that for FICC traders, their Dealerboard or Turret voice trading systems from companies, such as IPC, are mission critical.

So what will you do if your voice trading system goes down? Well, you’ve just started to answer the question how to lose over $9 million in an hour.

In addition to maximizing profitably with reliable voice trading networks, financial services firms must also meet regulatory obligations. Put simply, trading must be halted if compliance is not possible.

A malfunction of the recording system will quite literally silence a trading floor.

Large players in FICC trading have trading volumes in the billions of dollars per year, meaning every minute a system is shutdown translates to substantial losses. It goes without saying that the reliability of the voice trading solutions is critical to the financial success of the business.

So, reliability is vital – and being able to rely on your reliability is the key. An ITIC survey from 2016 found that reliability requirements for the Banking and Finance sector were above the average of other industries, and that 72% of companies in this sector require a minimum of 99.999% (four nines) of uptime from their IT systems.

In non-IT speak, this means less than one hour per year of downtime – with financial institutions reporting that they can lose an average of $9.3 Million during one hour of downtime.

But here’s the rub: UC systems have a base reliability of no more than 99.5% guaranteed uptime under industry standards. That means at the very highest performance level, an investment firm will lose 29 hours. At an average loss of $9.3 million per hour, that’s a costly $269.7 million thrown away.

Manual testing increases system uptime to 99.8% on average, a 0.3 percent improvement in reliability that cuts downtime to 12 hours. That’s still $111.6 million in losses that could be prevented by keeping voice trading systems up. Plus manual testing adds operational costs to deployments and regular upgrades.

Automation can increase system reliability up to minimum of 99.99%, which reduces downtime per year to 36 minutes or less. That brings voice system outage losses down to about $5.6 million (and that’s for the year, not the hour!). That’s still a hefty sum, but a mere fraction of what is lost through manual test or no testing.

A more proactive automated program that increases frequency and includes after-hours testing can get that reliability up to the all-important ‘four nines,’ driving annual downtime to just five minutes.

That brings the downtime loss below a million to $775,000.

An automated solution costs about two percent of the overall UC and voice trading system but represents a 60 to 70% annual savings compared to manual testing.

I think it’s safe to say that’s rather modest compared to the savings in preventable loss, of which is in the hundreds of million dollars.

Want to know more?

For more on how IPC and tekVizion is working with investment banks to augment manual testing of voice trading platforms such as Dealerboard or Turret systems with the fully automated tekVizion Automation, dramatically mitigating risk and reducing the cost while increasing the coverage of testing, visit https://www.ipc.com/resource-center/ipc-and-tekvizion/

© 2020-2021 IPC Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this publication are intended for general information purposes only and should not be construed as legal or regulatory advice.